CERIN AMROTH · RESEARCH

LRD Watch DR1 · candidate

LRDW J224850.97-443332.2

candidate tableSILVERmain classcolour laneAbell S1063
RA 22:48:50.977 342.2124040°
Dec −44:33:32.30 -44.5589711°

Images

F090W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F090W0.03″ px
F115W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F115W0.03″ px
F150W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F150W0.03″ px
F200W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F200W0.03″ px
F277W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F277W0.06″ px
F356W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F356W0.06″ px
F410M image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F410M0.06″ px
F444W image, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
F444W0.06″ px
Colour composite: F444W red, F356W green, F277W blue, 3.2 arcsec across, north up
compositebar 1″

3.2″ across, north up, east left, resampled from the deepest mosaic covering the object in each band; ticks mark the catalogue position. Each band is stretched on its own noise; the composite shares one flux scale, so its colour is real.

Spectral energy distribution

11.523451310301003001000150020003000400050006000Balmer limitrest frame (Å) at z = 7.122, spectroscopicobserved wavelength (µm)flux density (nJy)
  • NIRCam wide
  • NIRCam medium
  • 2σ upper limit (S/N < 2)
Aperture fluxes in a 0.16″-radius circle, not corrected to total; the values are in the photometry table below. The gold line marks the Balmer limit (3646 Å rest) at z = 7.122.

At a glance

Tier
SILVER main class
Found by
colour lane
Redshift
7.122 DJA grade 3, grating
Spectral shape
no PRISM spectrum de Graaff+25 criteria
F444W
25.76 AB S/N 265, 0.16″ aperture
F277W − F444W
1.19 mag strict redness
BH* share
not in the BH* channel
Compactness
FWHM 0.183″
Balmer break
1.53 ± 0.22 F356W/F210M, red:Hb+OIII+blue:far-uv
Image vetting
half-stack pass; no flags raised
Literature
no published match within 1″

Vetting

  • Image vettingpassed
  • Half-stack testpass
  • Artifact risknone
  • Neighbournone
  • Extendedno
  • No vetting notes.

Redshifts

Each redshift keeps its own column. Photometric redshifts of little red dots are unreliable: against spectra, about a third of AGN-template redshifts (z_agn; 31 of 95 in the last purity run) and about half of galaxy-template redshifts at z > 3 were catastrophic outliers (methods Section 8).

ColumnWhat it iszSource
z_specSpectroscopic, DJA grade 37.1221glimpse-obs02-v4_g395m-f290lp_9223_6297.spec.fits
z_vetAdopted by vetting7.1221zspec:dja_specz_grade3.csv:6297
z_photPhotometric (P(z) peak)6.92468%: 6.814–7.044
z_bhsBH* channel fit——
z_agnColour-lane fit7.08AGN-inclusive templates

Spectral checks

V-shape (spectrum)
no PRISM spectrum
Star (spectrum)
no
V-shape (photometry)
fails βUV −1.94, βopt −0.71 at z_agn
Line in F410M
Hb, OIII 1 line-free optical band(s)
Line-ambiguous
yes
Settling verdict
no extraction

Literature

Published objects within 1″ of this position. A match is a positional recovery, not an adopted classification.

  • No published JWST little red dot or broad-line AGN within 1″.

Photometry

Circular aperture of radius 0.16″ at each band's native resolution, background from a 0.40–0.65″ annulus, programmes combined by inverse variance. For a point source multiply by the field's aperture correction (r = 0.16″ → 0.70″). Grey rows are below S/N 2.

BandInstrumentPivot (µm)f (nJy)σ (nJy)AB magS/NAp. corr.
F090WNIRCam wide0.9029.640.8028.9412.11.54–1.61
F115WNIRCam wide1.15451.420.8627.1259.61.51–1.59
F150WNIRCam wide1.50158.680.9026.9865.41.48–1.56
F200WNIRCam wide1.98957.090.8327.0168.91.47–1.56
F210MNIRCam medium2.09552.577.6227.106.91.56
F277WNIRCam wide2.76259.800.8026.9674.91.61–1.68
F300MNIRCam medium2.99056.914.5627.0112.51.58–1.70
F356WNIRCam wide3.56880.420.7826.64103.61.66–1.73
F410MNIRCam medium4.082265.481.4325.34185.91.69–1.77
F444WNIRCam wide4.404179.560.6825.76264.91.71–1.80
F480MNIRCam medium4.816119.132.3126.2151.51.76–1.85

Provenance

Field
Abell S1063 (aco,as1063x)
Programmes
01840, 03293, 06882 behind every mosaic the field measured
Pipeline rows merged
4 largest separation 0.007″
Detection pass
original
Release build
33af9933d1cc 2026-10-17T14:29:44Z

Image sources

BandMosaicNative pixelCoverage
F090Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f090w_i2d.fits0.031″1.00
F115Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f115w_i2d.fits0.031″1.00
F150Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f150w_i2d.fits0.031″1.00
F200Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f200w_i2d.fits0.031″1.00
F277Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f277w_i2d.fits0.063″1.00
F356Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f356w_i2d.fits0.063″1.00
F410Mjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f410m_i2d.fits0.063″1.00
F444Wjw03293-o001_t001_nircam_clear-f444w_i2d.fits0.063″1.00

Cite

Anderson, Jordan (2026). LRD Watch DR1: little red dot candidates from an independent search of public JWST imaging (Version DR1) [Data set]. Cerin Amroth Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23062632 Object LRDW J224850.97-443332.2.

CC BY 4.0. Please also acknowledge the JWST programmes that took the data. LRD Watch DR1 is a vetted candidate catalogue, not a complete census: it has no selection function and cannot on its own give number densities. About the release.