LRD Watch DR1 · catalog object
LRDW J100042.21+022236.3
Images









3.2″ across, north up, east left, resampled from the deepest mosaic covering the object in each band; ticks mark the catalogue position. Each band is stretched on its own noise; the composite shares one flux scale, so its colour is real.
Spectral energy distribution
- NIRCam wide
- NIRCam medium
- MIRI
- 2σ upper limit (S/N < 2)
At a glance
- Tier
- SILVER main class
- Found by
- BH* channel + colour lane
- Redshift
- 6.77 photometric
- Spectral shape
- no labelled spectrum
- F444W
- 26.31 AB S/N 48, 0.16″ aperture
- F277W − F444W
- 1.13 mag strict redness
- BH* share
- 0.82 cliff_degraaff25; Δχ² galaxy 4.8, dwarf 28.5
- Compactness
- growth ratio 1.846 stars 2.248
- Balmer break
- 5.65 ± 1.26 F356W/F200W, red:Hb+OIII+blue:far-uv
- Image vetting
- half-stack pass; no flags raised
- Literature
- 5 catalogue(s), 0 AGN paper(s) within 0.011″
Vetting
- Image vettingpassed
- Half-stack testpass
- Artifact risknone
- Neighbournone
- Extendedno
- BH* channelevidence dchi2_gal=4.8 dchi2_bd=28.5
Redshifts
Each redshift keeps its own column. Photometric redshifts of little red dots are unreliable: against spectra, about a third of AGN-template redshifts (z_agn; 31 of 95 in the last purity run) and about half of galaxy-template redshifts at z > 3 were catastrophic outliers (methods Section 8).
| Column | What it is | z | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
z_spec | Spectroscopic, DJA grade 3 | — | — |
z_vet | Adopted by vetting | 6.7680 | pz:z_map (zpub 4.93 simbad.csv:[KFB2025] PRIMER-COS 8550 [2025ApJ...992...26L] DISAGREES) |
z_phot | Photometric (P(z) peak) | 6.768 | 68%: 1.834–6.958 |
z_bhs | BH* channel fit | 4.958 | cliff_degraaff25 |
z_agn | Colour-lane fit | 1.53 | AGN-inclusive templates |
Spectral checks
- V-shape (spectrum)
- no labelled spectrum
- Star (spectrum)
- no spectrum
- V-shape (photometry)
- not measurable βUV not measured, βopt −0.15 at z_agn
- Line in F410M
- OIII 0 line-free optical band(s)
- Line-ambiguous
- yes
- Settling verdict
- inconclusive
Literature
Published objects within 1″ of this position. A match is a positional recovery, not an adopted classification.
- Barro et al. (2026)
- Kocevski et al. (2024)
- Kokorev et al. (2024)
- Leung et al. (2024)
- Weibel et al. (2026), BH*-dominated sample
Photometry
Circular aperture of radius 0.16″ at each band's native resolution, background from a 0.40–0.65″ annulus, programmes combined by inverse variance. For a point source multiply by the field's aperture correction (r = 0.16″ → 0.70″). Grey rows are below S/N 2.
| Band | Instrument | Pivot (µm) | f (nJy) | σ (nJy) | AB mag | S/N | Ap. corr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | NIRCam wide | 0.902 | 9.60 | 5.19 | 28.94 | 1.9 | 1.14–1.15 |
| F115W | NIRCam wide | 1.154 | 10.61 | 4.81 | 28.84 | 2.2 | 1.12–1.13 |
| F150W | NIRCam wide | 1.501 | 17.24 | 3.91 | 28.31 | 4.4 | 1.11–1.11 |
| F200W | NIRCam wide | 1.989 | 15.00 | 3.35 | 28.46 | 4.5 | 1.09–1.10 |
| F277W | NIRCam wide | 2.762 | 38.17 | 1.82 | 27.45 | 21.0 | 1.20–1.21 |
| F300M | NIRCam medium | 2.990 | 55.66 | 3.33 | 27.04 | 16.7 | 1.23 |
| F356W | NIRCam wide | 3.568 | 84.74 | 1.79 | 26.58 | 47.3 | 1.23–1.24 |
| F410M | NIRCam medium | 4.082 | 118.67 | 3.40 | 26.21 | 34.9 | 1.26–1.27 |
| F444W | NIRCam wide | 4.404 | 108.29 | 2.24 | 26.31 | 48.3 | 1.27–1.28 |
| F770W | MIRI | 7.636 | 56.86 | 13.04 | 27.01 | 4.4 | 1.83 |
| F1280W | MIRI | 12.809 | 11.63 | 54.77 | 28.74 | 0.2 | — |
| F1500W | MIRI | 15.048 | 123.31 | 68.95 | 26.17 | 1.8 | — |
| F1800W | MIRI | 17.970 | 20.15 | 112.78 | 28.14 | 0.2 | — |
Provenance
- Field
- COSMOS (PRIMER COSMOS-2 tile 11); COSMOS (PRIMER COSMOS-2) (
cosmos2tile11,primercosmos2) - Programmes
01837, 02321, 06368, 07814behind every mosaic the field measured- Pipeline rows merged
- 5 largest separation 0.013″
- Detection pass
- original
- Release build
33af9933d1cc2026-10-17T14:29:44Z
Image sources
| Band | Mosaic | Native pixel | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f090w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F115W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f115w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F150W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f150w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F200W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f200w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F277W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f277w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F356W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f356w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F410M | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f410m_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F444W | jw01837-o004_t004_nircam_clear-f444w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
Cite
Anderson, Jordan (2026). LRD Watch DR1: little red dot candidates from an independent search of public JWST imaging (Version DR1) [Data set]. Cerin Amroth Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23062632 Object LRDW J100042.21+022236.3.
CC BY 4.0. Please also acknowledge the JWST programmes that took the data. LRD Watch DR1 is a vetted candidate catalogue, not a complete census: it has no selection function and cannot on its own give number densities. About the release.