LRD Watch DR1 · catalog object
LRDW J100019.87+021639.8
Images









3.2″ across, north up, east left, resampled from the deepest mosaic covering the object in each band; ticks mark the catalogue position. Each band is stretched on its own noise; the composite shares one flux scale, so its colour is real.
Spectral energy distribution
- NIRCam wide
- NIRCam medium
- MIRI
- 2σ upper limit (S/N < 2)
At a glance
- Tier
- TENTATIVE
- Found by
- BH* channel + colour lane
- Redshift
- 5.380 DJA grade 3, PRISM
- Spectral shape
- V-shaped de Graaff+25 criteria
- F444W
- 25.66 AB S/N 80, 0.16″ aperture
- F277W − F444W
- 1.78 mag strict redness
- BH* share
- 0.86 bhs_bb4200_b4; Δχ² galaxy 11.1, dwarf 62.8
- Compactness
- growth ratio 1.840 stars 2.250
- Balmer break
- 2.07 ± 0.23 F277W/F200W, red:Hb+OIII
- Image vetting
- half-stack pass; 1 flag(s)
- Literature
- 7 catalogue(s), 0 AGN paper(s) within 0.014″
Vetting
- Image vettingnot applicable
- Half-stack testpass
- Artifact risknone
- Neighbourflagged
- Extendedno
- colour laneneighbor-contam footprint-overlap id 50255 at 0.27" (npix=180, r_eq=0.48")
- BH* channelneighbor-contam footprint-overlap id 50255 at 0.27" (npix=180, r_eq=0.48")
Redshifts
Each redshift keeps its own column. Photometric redshifts of little red dots are unreliable: against spectra, about a third of AGN-template redshifts (z_agn; 31 of 95 in the last purity run) and about half of galaxy-template redshifts at z > 3 were catastrophic outliers (methods Section 8).
| Column | What it is | z | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
z_spec | Spectroscopic, DJA grade 3 | 5.3801 | mom-cos04-v4_prism-clear_5224_279078.spec.fits |
z_vet | Adopted by vetting | 5.3801 | zspec:dja_specz_grade3.csv:279078 |
z_phot | Photometric (P(z) peak) | 2.421 | 68%: 2.294–6.209 |
z_bhs | BH* channel fit | 5.434 | bhs_bb4200_b4 |
z_agn | Colour-lane fit | 5.49 | AGN-inclusive templates |
Spectral checks
- V-shape (spectrum)
- V-shaped
- Star (spectrum)
- no
- V-shape (photometry)
- passes βUV −3.00, βopt 2.22 at z_agn
- Line in F410M
- Ha 1 line-free optical band(s)
- Line-ambiguous
- yes
- Settling verdict
- not evaluated
Literature
Published objects within 1″ of this position. A match is a positional recovery, not an adopted classification.
- Akins et al. (2024)
- Barro et al. (2026)
- de Graaff et al. (2025)
- Kocevski et al. (2024)
- Kokorev et al. (2024)
- Leung et al. (2024)
- Weibel et al. (2026), BH*-dominated sample
Photometry
Circular aperture of radius 0.16″ at each band's native resolution, background from a 0.40–0.65″ annulus, programmes combined by inverse variance. For a point source multiply by the field's aperture correction (r = 0.16″ → 0.70″). Grey rows are below S/N 2.
| Band | Instrument | Pivot (µm) | f (nJy) | σ (nJy) | AB mag | S/N | Ap. corr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | NIRCam wide | 0.902 | 8.98 | 4.72 | 29.02 | 1.9 | 1.15 |
| F115W | NIRCam wide | 1.154 | 15.34 | 4.41 | 28.43 | 3.5 | 1.12 |
| F150W | NIRCam wide | 1.501 | 11.80 | 3.57 | 28.72 | 3.3 | 1.11 |
| F200W | NIRCam wide | 1.989 | 18.62 | 1.87 | 28.23 | 10.0 | 1.09–1.11 |
| F212N | NIRCam wide | 2.121 | 25.66 | 24.98 | 27.88 | 1.0 | 1.14 |
| F277W | NIRCam wide | 2.762 | 38.23 | 1.85 | 27.44 | 20.6 | 1.20 |
| F300M | NIRCam medium | 2.990 | 56.03 | 3.89 | 27.03 | 14.4 | 1.22 |
| F356W | NIRCam wide | 3.568 | 88.75 | 1.81 | 26.53 | 49.0 | 1.24 |
| F360M | NIRCam medium | 3.624 | 75.87 | 3.74 | 26.70 | 20.3 | 1.24 |
| F410M | NIRCam medium | 4.082 | 250.24 | 3.61 | 25.40 | 69.2 | 1.26 |
| F444W | NIRCam wide | 4.404 | 197.72 | 2.47 | 25.66 | 80.0 | 1.27 |
| F1500W | MIRI | 15.048 | 155.27 | 55.73 | 25.92 | 2.8 | 4.24 |
Provenance
- Field
- COSMOS (PRIMER) (
cosmos) - Programmes
01837, 02321, 07814behind every mosaic the field measured- Pipeline rows merged
- 3 all at one position
- Detection pass
- original
- Release build
33af9933d1cc2026-10-17T14:29:44Z
Image sources
| Band | Mosaic | Native pixel | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f090w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F115W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f115w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F150W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f150w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F200W | jw02321-o002_t001_nircam_clear-f200w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F277W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f277w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F356W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f356w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F410M | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f410m_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F444W | jw01837-o003_t003_nircam_clear-f444w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
Cite
Anderson, Jordan (2026). LRD Watch DR1: little red dot candidates from an independent search of public JWST imaging (Version DR1) [Data set]. Cerin Amroth Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23062632 Object LRDW J100019.87+021639.8.
CC BY 4.0. Please also acknowledge the JWST programmes that took the data. LRD Watch DR1 is a vetted candidate catalogue, not a complete census: it has no selection function and cannot on its own give number densities. About the release.