LRD Watch DR1 · catalog object
LRDW J021711.04-050859.6
Images









3.2″ across, north up, east left, resampled from the deepest mosaic covering the object in each band; ticks mark the catalogue position. Each band is stretched on its own noise; the composite shares one flux scale, so its colour is real.
Spectral energy distribution
- NIRCam wide
- NIRCam medium
- MIRI
- 2σ upper limit (S/N < 2)
At a glance
- Tier
- TENTATIVE
- Found by
- BH* channel + colour lane
- Redshift
- 5.684 DJA grade 3, PRISM
- Spectral shape
- unclassifiable de Graaff+25 criteria
- F444W
- 26.60 AB S/N 22, 0.16″ aperture
- F277W − F444W
- 1.81 mag strict redness
- BH* share
- 0.71 bhs_bb4200_b8; Δχ² galaxy 2.1, dwarf −13.8
- Compactness
- growth ratio 2.718 stars 2.271
- Balmer break
- 1.98 ± 0.31 F356W/F200W, red:Hb+OIII
- Image vetting
- half-stack pass; 2 flag(s)
- Literature
- 5 catalogue(s), 4 AGN paper(s) within 0.021″
Vetting
- Image vettingnot applicable
- Half-stack testpass
- Artifact riskflagged
- Neighbournone
- Extendedyes
- colour laneartifact-risk low-coverage n_exp=2 < 3 (F444W)
- BH* channeldwarf grid fits better (dchi2_bd=-13.8) but z_spec confirms
- BH* channelevidence dchi2_gal=2.1 dchi2_bd=-13.8
- BH* channelBH* share 0.71 below 0.8 (composite)
- BH* channelartifact-risk low-coverage n_exp=2 < 3 (F444W)
- BH* channelextended fwhm=0.241" vs PSF 0.145" (F444W)
Redshifts
Each redshift keeps its own column. Photometric redshifts of little red dots are unreliable: against spectra, about a third of AGN-template redshifts (z_agn; 31 of 95 in the last purity run) and about half of galaxy-template redshifts at z > 3 were catastrophic outliers (methods Section 8).
| Column | What it is | z | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
z_spec | Spectroscopic, DJA grade 3 | 5.6840 | rubies-uds22-v4_prism-clear_4233_139709.spec.fits |
z_vet | Adopted by vetting | 5.6840 | zspec:dja_specz_grade3.csv:139709 |
z_phot | Photometric (P(z) peak) | 2.561 | 68%: 2.317–2.670 |
z_bhs | BH* channel fit | 6.654 | bhs_bb4200_b8 |
z_agn | Colour-lane fit | 2.56 | AGN-inclusive templates |
Spectral checks
- V-shape (spectrum)
- unclassifiable
- Star (spectrum)
- no
- V-shape (photometry)
- not measurable βUV not measured, βopt −1.61 at z_agn
- Line in F410M
- none 2 line-free optical band(s)
- Line-ambiguous
- no
- Settling verdict
- not evaluated
Literature
Published objects within 1″ of this position. A match is a positional recovery, not an adopted classification.
- Barro et al. (2026)
- de Graaff et al. (2025)
- Kocevski et al. (2024)
- Kokorev et al. (2024)
- Leung et al. (2024)
- Baccus+2026 (DJA census) broad-line AGN
- Hviding+2025 broad-line AGN
- Jones+2025 broad-line AGN
- Taylor+2025 (CEERS/RUBIES) broad-line AGN
Photometry
Circular aperture of radius 0.16″ at each band's native resolution, background from a 0.40–0.65″ annulus, programmes combined by inverse variance. For a point source multiply by the field's aperture correction (r = 0.16″ → 0.70″). Grey rows are below S/N 2.
| Band | Instrument | Pivot (µm) | f (nJy) | σ (nJy) | AB mag | S/N | Ap. corr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | NIRCam wide | 0.902 | 28.07 | 5.93 | 27.78 | 4.7 | 1.15 |
| F115W | NIRCam wide | 1.154 | 26.23 | 6.18 | 27.85 | 4.2 | 1.12 |
| F150W | NIRCam wide | 1.501 | 26.15 | 5.08 | 27.86 | 5.2 | 1.11 |
| F200W | NIRCam wide | 1.989 | 29.21 | 4.28 | 27.74 | 6.8 | 1.09 |
| F277W | NIRCam wide | 2.762 | 15.73 | 2.81 | 28.41 | 5.6 | 1.20 |
| F356W | NIRCam wide | 3.568 | 57.58 | 2.89 | 27.00 | 19.9 | 1.23 |
| F410M | NIRCam medium | 4.082 | 65.65 | 5.00 | 26.86 | 13.1 | 1.26 |
| F444W | NIRCam wide | 4.404 | 83.36 | 3.72 | 26.60 | 22.4 | 1.27 |
| F1280W | MIRI | 12.809 | 90.01 | 49.39 | 26.51 | 1.8 | 3.12 |
| F1500W | MIRI | 15.048 | 66.06 | 61.54 | 26.85 | 1.1 | 3.86 |
Provenance
- Field
- UDS (PRIMER UDS-2) (
primeruds2) - Programmes
01837, 07814behind every mosaic the field measured- Pipeline rows merged
- 3 all at one position
- Detection pass
- original
- Release build
33af9933d1cc2026-10-17T14:29:44Z
Image sources
| Band | Mosaic | Native pixel | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| F090W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f090w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F115W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f115w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F150W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f150w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F200W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f200w_i2d.fits | 0.031″ | 1.00 |
| F277W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f277w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F356W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f356w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F410M | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f410m_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
| F444W | jw01837-c1001_t000_nircam_clear-f444w_i2d.fits | 0.063″ | 1.00 |
Cite
Anderson, Jordan (2026). LRD Watch DR1: little red dot candidates from an independent search of public JWST imaging (Version DR1) [Data set]. Cerin Amroth Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23062632 Object LRDW J021711.04-050859.6.
CC BY 4.0. Please also acknowledge the JWST programmes that took the data. LRD Watch DR1 is a vetted candidate catalogue, not a complete census: it has no selection function and cannot on its own give number densities. About the release.